There are a lot of gun control statistics in the world and not everyone can agree on gun control pros and cons. For many people involved in the debate, the pros and cons of gun control are affected by their political opinion on the subject. And this, in turn, is often determined by the background that they come from.
On both sides of the gun control debate, people will naturally deviate toward the gun control statistics that best represent their point of view and suggest that it demonstrates that they were right all along. As Mark Twain once said, facts are stubborn things, but statistics are more pliable.
Gun control statistics are a complicated factor. They are almost always relevant to public policy in one way or another. In fact, the very concept of statistics, or the very root of the word, is related to public policy. The word statistic derives from the word “state” because the principles behind the theory were originally developed by the French mathematician Quetelet to keep track of all of the important facts about the state, both on a sociological and economic level.
Gun control statistics can go a long way toward helping people who want to learn the ins and outs of the issue. But it is very difficult for anyone who has no subjective opinion on the issue of gun control to develop an opinion on the issue. The reason is because few people will present the statistics that contradict their views on the subject.
For this reason, to decide where they stand on the issue, people first have to develop a sort of framework that they can use to determine what they believe is right and what they believe is wrong. Gun control statistics can go a long way toward helping people determine how facts on the ground relate to the world view that they have developed, but they might not be the choice for everyone.